Friday, July 28, 2017

Is the Transgender Military Ban Really a "Long Con"?

I have a theory about the Transgender Military Ban (TMB).

If you take the TMB at face value, it is obviously despicable, and openly discriminatory toward a segment of the population who has volunteered to serve their country.  Personally, I feel that if a person is able and willing to defend their country – at the possible cost of their life – they should be shown all the respect and honor we can give.

On the other hand, if you take a step back and look at the TMB in a broader light, it appears to be more of a political move by the GOP, intended it influence the midterm elections.  A political move so brilliant, that I don’t believe President Trump conceived it on his own. 

Allow me to explain.

According to the various reports that have been floated, there are anywhere from 6,000 to 15,000 transgendered people serving in the military.  If you take the most liberal of these estimates, this ban will directly impact 0.00005% of the population (15,000 transgendered military members / 323,100,000 US population).  Granted, it will “piss off” a lot more than that, but it will only DIRECTLY impact 5/100,000ths of one percent – a proverbial “drop in the bucket”.

In light of that fact, I don’t believe that the TMB is about transgendered people in the military AT ALL.   In fact, I think that whoever conceived this plan (someone smarter than Trump) probably doesn’t care one way or the other whether or not transgendered people serve in the military.  It is actually a “long con” – and it’s only real purpose is to impact the midterm elections. After all, this is the end of July 2017.  We are about to enter the midterm campaign season. 

I believe that the sole intent and purpose of the TMB was to get progressive, liberal, democrats to “blow up” social media, cable news channels and other information outlets with posts and stories bemoaning Trump (and by association the GOP at large) for being uncaring, hateful, bigoted scum.  They want to see Facebook and Twitter flooded with posts by liberals about how they are “literally in tears” or “too angry for words” over this ban, implying that anyone who doesn’t share their view must also be a hateful bigot.

For the most part, the LGBT community generally congregates together in large metropolitan Coastal areas, i.e. San Francisco, New Orleans, New York, etc. 

The GOP is focusing more on Middle America – places like Dubuque, IA, Topeka, KS, and Muskogee, OK.  In these more rural “heartland” areas, the vast majority of people have no connection to the transgendered community at all – they are not transgendered, no one in their family is transgendered, and they don’t personally know anyone who is transgendered.  Therefore the Transgendered Military Ban has no impact on them whatsoever.  These are people who get up and go to work every morning, come home, eat supper, drink a beer, watch a little TV, and go to bed – only to get up tomorrow and do it all again.  They also don’t like being “preached to” about how they should be more tolerant and inclusive of people they don’t know, don’t know anything about, have never met, and probably never will meet.

The GOP is counting on these blue-collar, rural Americans to enter the voting booth next November and associate all the condescending Facebook “bitching & whining” with the (D) column on the ballot – and as a result, place their checkmark next to the (R) column.


I believe that this whole “Transgender Military Ban” is simply a long con designed to gain seats in the midterms.

No comments:

Post a Comment